Issue

Biodiesel

Submitted by: Kelly Endo | 6 comments  VIEW COMMENTS


Photographer : Jennifer

What is it?

Biodiesel is an alternative fuel that is produced from renewable resources. It’s biodegradable, nontoxic, clean burning and can be mixed with petrol to create a biodiesel blend.

The process uses vegetable oils and animal fats to produce methyl esters (biodiesel). More commonly used crops used in this process are soy, canola, cotton seed and mustard seed. A chemical process called transesterification separates glycerin from the fat or oil leaving two products: biodiesel (methyl esters) and glycerin. Glycerin is a commonly used product in soaps and other common products so there is essentially no waste created in this process.

Why should I use it?

The first major point is that biodiesel is made from renewable resources (vegetable oil and animal fats). Not having to worry about running out in the future is a major plus. In addition to being able to sustain biodiesel in our own back yards, the decrease of dependence on foreign oil is a huge step. This will also create more jobs (such as biodiesel crop farming) and in turn boost our economy.

Another major positive for biodiesel is that it’s better for our environment. It produces a lot less emission than normal petrol diesel. As a matter of fact, the toxicity is less than ordinary table salt and it’s as biodegradable as sugar!

Toxicity facts for biodiesel usage include:
  • emissions that cause health problems such as asthma are reduced 47%
  • carbon monoxide (which is poisonous) is reduced 48%
  • carbon dioxide is 80% less
  • sulfur dioxide, which causes acid rain, is practically eliminated
  • combustion leaves 90% less unburned hydrocarbons, causing hydrocarbon emission (which produces smog and ozone depletion) to decrease 90%

Other positive qualities of biodiesel are:
  • It does not use more energy to make than it produces. Including the planting and harvesting of crops, as well as fuel production and transportation, for every unit of energy it takes to make biodiesel, 3.2 units are gained.
  • It can be mixed at any level with petroleum diesel to create a blend that is suitable for cars with minor, if any modifications (the most common is B-20, which is 20% biodiesel and 80% petrol diesel).
  • It has very little difference in performance, consumption, horsepower, torque, and haulage rates compared to diesel fuel.
  • The flash temperature (temperature it ignites in the air) is much higher for biodiesel making it safer to be around.

Significantly, biodiesel is the only alternative fuel to pass the Environmental Protection Agency’s safety testing in the US (one of the most thorough testing for current technology).

Some negative points

Biodiesel has a tendency to gel up in cold weather, which is a potential problem in colder climates. Another possible negative is that depending on the mixture, emissions of nitrogen oxide, a greenhouse gas, can be slightly higher than petrol diesel. Also, like normal fuel, biodiesel has a shelf life which tends to be between 6-12 months. Since biodiesel is a low sulfur fuel, it may cause some damage to car parts. For this reason, many equipment manufacturers have switched their parts to ones suitable for low sulfur fuel.

Where can I get it?

Biodiesel producers and petrol distributors should be able to provide it for you, or at least tell you the nearest place that sells biodiesel. There are public biodiesel pumps now available, so you can fill up with clean fuel at the station as usual. There is one in Sydney called The Biodiesel Station located at 73 Marrickville Road, Marrickville NSW 2204. This station supplies the B50 biodiesel (half bio, half petrol diesel).

What’s the deal in Australia?

Currently, Australia relies on foreign countries for more than 50% of our fuel. Advocates of biodiesel claim that increasing our use of biodiesel will not only increase Australia’s independence, but also create more jobs such as biodiesel crop farming.

Action is being taken to integrate biodiesel into the country and our daily lives. The Leichhardt Municipal Council in Sydney has switched over all of its trucks, sweepers, tractors and mowers to B50 biodiesel. This has reduced their Greenhouse gas emissions by at least 30% and sets an example for other companies to follow.

In the Northern Territory 5 Darwin busses are now running on biodiesel for a trial. Also, Natural Fuels is creating a 77 million dollar biodiesel facility at East Arm in the Northern Terrritory. This facility will provide three times more production than existing plants in Australia. The Federal Government has helped out by implementing a tax exemption for biodiesel to encourage people to use this environment friendly resource. This ultimately lowers the costs of biodiesel making it more affordable than normal petrol.

A new biodiesel plant opened in Adelaide at the end of March 2006. It is capable of producing about 45 million litres of diesel per year (keep in mind the US and Europe are producing 1-2 billion litres per year). The government has made a target of 350 million megalitres of renewable fuel to be made each year.

Global scope

Biodiesel is now being used in Germany, Italy, Austria, Czech Republic, Malaysia, Sweden, France, the US, Australia and many more countries. France is the world’s largest producer, integrating biodiesel into every litre of low sulphur diesel in the country. In Sweden, they have made the first biogas run train! Also, in the US, the federal and state vehicles are a good way into their switch to using biodiesel blends.

How do I know this?

Biodiesel.org, http://www.biodiesel.org

Biodiesel.org, Biodiesel 101. http://www.biodiesel.org/resources/biodiesel_basic...

The biodiesel station, http://www.thebiodieselstation.com/component/optio...
Discuss Now 6 comments View all 1 2

astarael 09-May-2007

haha we had a debate on biodiesel tonight - we won yay!

at first i was a bit annoyed about having to argue the negative sid eof the debate, as i was generally in favour of biofuels, however i think i may have convinced myself otherwise!!

there are interesting arguments both for and against. according to the research we read, when you account for all the fossil fuels burned in hte production (making pesticides, fertilisers etc.) total carbon emissions are reduced only by 9%, yet emission of other chemicals such as nitrous oxides are increased! i guess it comes down to which is worse then...

one point that i think does need to be considered is deforestation - some anti-biofuel lobbyists claim large sclae introduction of fuels could lead to the desertification of the amazon rainforest, which probably is a slight exaggeration in terms of near future, but demand for the raw materials used to produce biofuel certainly would increase the demand for arable land, which would almost certainly mean the logging of forests to make way for agriculture. aside from the fact that deforestation reduces our environements ability to act as a carbon sink i.e. absorb carbon from the atmosphere, large scale deforestation would also lead to a loss of biodiversity, which would be a great shame.

implementing such large scale changes in anything usually has consequences further down the track that aren't always considered. anyway, just some "fuel" for thought... :P

i think biofuels are certainly a better alternative to burning fossil fuels, however as mentioned in a previous comment, not highly efficient.

for us to make any real difference in terms of global warming we need to look at reducing energy consumption - fossil fuels are a problem, but the problem has been exacerbated by the rampant energy consumption they encouraged. if all arable land was devoted to production of biocrops, it could only satisfy 20% of global demand which suggests that the main problem is not the fuels we are using but our insatiable appetite for them.

pia :)

p.s. my first ever comment, so be nice :P

Erin 12-Mar-2007

I'm not sure it's ever going to be possible to make a complete conversion to biodiesel or any other renewable energy source in the near future. Biodiesel could be a great boon for farmers, and for other associated industries. And it's clean so it will obviously help to reduce Co2 emissions. But here's the long and the short of it: we're going to run out of dinosaurs in the ground before we run out of corn, so perhaps investing in these technologies is prudent, if only to make the supply of fossil fuels last longer.

raconteurette 02-Sep-2006

the lab rats link don't work... very interested tho

trappleton 30-Aug-2006

Biofuels are promising as a fuel additive, however, there are several pitfalls that need to be overcome first.

First is a point made by Jeremy Cato of the Canadian newspaper Globe and Mail, saying, "Neither [ethanol nor biodiesel] can replace much petroleum without impacting food supplies. Even dedicating all U.S. corn and soybean production to biofuels would meet only 12% of gasoline demand and 6% of diesel demand." This would send food prices through the roof, and probably even have a similar impact on the fuel prices it's supposed to help. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM...

Second, what about all the water necessary to grow all these crops that won't be used for food? There's already a lot of fighting over freshwater in the States, and crops are still mostly being used just for food. What happens during a drought? http://www.dnr.ne.gov/dnrnews/spring97/page1.html

The other thing most people forget is that corn or sugarbeets or wherever the fuel is coming from takes energy to farm. Sorry to use the United States for all my examples... it's just what I know. But currently, the US would have to dedicate 600 million acres of land just to corn production for use in biofuels. The US only has 420 million acres of arable land, and most of that would have to be plowed under -- it's almost entirely wetlands, forests and natural vegetation.

It also takes 80% of the energy retrieved from corn ethanol just to farm it. This means that, to get an actual net gain in energy, it would take all the arable land in the US, at three crops per year (pretty much impossible), to cover half the imports from gas and diesel -- not counting coal or other sources. And there wouldn't be any farmland left for making food to eat. http://www.ethanol-gec.org/corn_eth.htm

'Course, corn isn't necessarily the answer. There are other crops, such as sorghum, which are much more efficient than corn.

There are even some other options, such as the literally near-perfect "Chicken Oil," ( http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/11/11... )which would solve a lot of problems. The only reason it's not happening on a wider scale, in the States at least, is because the government refuses to offer them the same huge subsidies they give the Big Oil companies. It sucks that this issue is so politicized, and really far more complex than I've presented here, otherwise we'd already have a few answers.

Tim Scutt 30-Jul-2006

BRILLIANT!!!
BioDiesel is a great alternative and should be looked at seriously. I'm glad some councils in Australia are setting the pace, i hope more follow.
I will advocate BioDiesel as an alternative. :)