Issue

GM foods

Sick of taking your vitamins? Tired of being allergic to peanuts? GM may have a solution, but is it worth the risks? Read more and decide for yourself...

Submitted 16/03/2006 By kellyendo Views 53434 Comments 15 Updated 3/05/2006


Caption : Sunflower
Photographer : Steve Erat


What are GM foods?

Genetically Modified (GM) foods are crops or animals that have been manipulated at the genetic level. Scientists take genes from one specimen and place them in another. This science was developed about twenty years ago but has only recently taken off.

A people divided

The world is pretty much split about GM food. A survey carried out in 2000 found 50% of Australians and Americans, 60% of people in the UK and 70% of French people are opposed to the production of GM foods. Many people believe that playing nature’s role and modifying animals and plants on a genetic level is not something to mess around with. However, others think this is perfectly acceptable and holds limitless potential.

Benefits

GM is faster and more efficient than conservative methods. It can benefit producers, consumers and the environment.

Producers

  • In the past, food producers relied on a process called selective breeding to create more sustainable and efficient crops. This process takes generations, whereas GM can work overnight!
  • Selective breeding can only alter genes that already exist in a species, but GM makes it possible for the genes of other species to be used as well, greatly broadening the potential of this science.
  • GM crops require a lot less labour—farmers no longer need to till the soil, which in turn reduces soil erosion.
  • Due to their quality, GM crops need less processing and fewer additives.
  • Crops can be equipped with ‘long lasting’ genes, preventing waste. For example a slow softening tomato has been produced that lasts longer!
  • GM crops use less pesticide, need less fertilizer and require less energy to process. A major player in the GM foods field, Monsanto, makes a potato whose genetically modified resistance to a local beetle supposedly saves 2,000 tonnes of pesticides, 180,000 containers and 150,000 gallons of fuel!
  • Main developments so far include crops that are pest, insect and disease resistant and that help to control weeds.
  • Planned future developments include crops that are drought resistant, salt tolerant and protect themselves from frost damage.

Consumers

  • Foods with higher protein, vitamins and minerals, less fat and cholesterol, and that last longer can be created.
  • Crops, such as peanuts, can be produced so they don’t contain the protein that many people are allergic to.
  • Some fruits can be manipulated to contain vaccines for diseases such as cholera and hepatitis.

Environment

  • Currently, about a quarter of the world’s crops are lost each year due to insects. GM can produce pest resistant crops, which reduce the use of harmful pesticides.
  • Plants that are more efficient at absorbing metals and radioactive elements can be developed to clean contaminated soil.
  • A plant in the mustard family has been modified to remove arsenic from soil. Potentially, it could help more than one million people who suffer from arsenic poisoning due to drinking contaminated water.

Concerns

Although there are many positive factors to support the production of GM foods, their implementation can affect our lives and the environment in negative ways too.

Health

  • Scientists still don’t know a lot about GM organisms. Who knows what the effects could be? Human consumption of GM foods hasn’t been happening for very long, so while now everything seems fine, in the future it could have bad effects.
  • Some of the newly developed modified genes are resistant to antibiotics, if these are introduced to food, and we eat them, then we could become resistant to certain antibiotics.
  • New allergies could develop. Also, if a gene is transferred from one organism to another then people allergic to that gene could react to any specimen carrying that gene as well. For example: when a gene from the brazil nut was transferred into a soybean, people allergic to brazil nuts had a reaction to the soy bean.
  • When testing the foods for safety, only the portion that has been changed is tested, instead of the food as a whole.

Environmental

  • GM crops can accidentally spread to neighbouring fields, spreading the GM traits and ruining the purity of organic crops.
  • GM crops with a ‘built in’ resistance to herbicides could spread the resistance to weeds, making them stronger and harder to get rid of. As a consequence, this would increase the use of herbicides and ground water contamination.
  • Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a natural pesticide used by organic farmers. If GM crops are modified to produce Bt, the insects could adapt and become Bt resistant.
  • Concerns have been raised about the affect GM has on biodiversity and nature’s balance. Examples include poisoning insects that are not harmful to crops and badly affecting birds and other prey that feed on those insects.
  • If only a few GM species of major crops are grown, a disease could potentially wipe out a more significant portion of them, than if many varieties were planted.

Ethical

  • Placing genes from animals into plants stirs ethical and religious concerns.
  • Genetic modification in animals can sometimes cause them health problems.
  • GM foods and animals are patented when created, so ultimately, life is being patented. Should that be allowed?
  • Complete control of GM food production and marketing is in the hands of a few multinational corporations.
  • Some people claim that we already have the resources and food production to tackle world hunger and what we need to work on is distribution.

Australian regulation

GM foods have a direct impact on you and the environment, so it’s good idea to know what Australia is doing to monitor the industry. The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) basically holds all responsibility for GM production and products in Australia and makes sure the GM foods in Australia are safe. To ensure safety, risks and benefits must be analysed and approved before a crop is grown and each product must be safety tested and appropriately labelled as a GM food product.

What about the future?

It is argued that GM holds great potential for our future. However, we are still far from knowing everything about it and its impact, both positive and negative.

Golden rice

The most promising crop so far is ‘golden rice’, which gets its name from the yellow tint it acquired from a gene derived from the daffodil. This substance, called beta-carotene, is converted to vitamin A in the human body. Around 700 million people suffer from vitamin A deficiency and approximately 2 million people die as a result each year. So, the development of the ‘golden rice’ is good news. Moreover, the rice holds a gene that allows the plant to increase the uptake of iron from the soil and in turn increase the absorption of iron into the human body. This could prove helpful to the 2 billion people suffering from iron deficiency.

Rich richer, poor poorer

Think about what GM will do to countries and farmers who don’t have access to resources or that prefer to continue using traditional methods. A lot of money is invested in GM food production and it’s predicted to become prominent in society. We can only hope that this production results in food the world needs both in quantity and nutritional quality and does not put people in developing countries out of business. Failure to distribute surplus food to places in need could also make world hunger much, much worse. Nevertheless, whether or not GM proves to be a major player in overcoming world hunger remains to be seen. Soon we will find out—the second wave of GM foods is only now beginning.

What do you think about it?

How do I know this?

Australian Consumer’s Association, GM: Genetically modified foods, http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=10025...

Food Future, http://www.foodfuture.org.uk/home.aspx

Howstuffworks.com, Concern grows over genetically modified foods, http://science.howstuffworks.com/framed.htm?parent...

Nutrition Australia, GM Foods and Human Nutrition, http://www.nutritionaustralia.org/Food_Facts/FAQ/g...

Discuss Now

Post Comment 1 | 2 | 3 |

RSS Comments
image

Yuilden 08-Apr-2008

The last point about dont know if its factual relates to GM labeling in the US.

-----

image

Yuilden 08-Apr-2008



Sorry - going to be a long post :)

Kelly, I find myself wondering if you are pro GM or just a fence sitter. Your pro points just smack of propoganda, setting off my bullshit meter. I advise you read some Michael Pollan books - while they wont directly cover the GM story i think it will give you more of a perspective on some of the flawed mentality that comes along with the GM story.

While there may be advantages in growing GM - generally the problems adressed are not ones which could be solved or even needed to be solved otherwise. Sure you may be able to grow more - but contrary to your points they usually require more inputs. You have not at all covered terminator genes - which would actually be good for western farmers only wanting to plant one iteration of a crop - but disastrous for 3rd worlders who relly on saving an amount of seeds for next years crop - GM can be counter productive to alleviating poverty. On that point too - the GM crops always (at least now) cost more because it's a 'better' product, with intellectual investment.


To hit home the feeding the world point - thats what monsanto says they want to do, my personal problem with this is that we need to reduce the human population, not increase it exponentially - that will kill this planet off faster than anything else - but no fear here yet, there is no 'silver bullet' on the horizon for feeding the world.

Recently Canadian farmers published an open letter http://www.consumersinternational.org/Shared_ASP_F...
Man thats a long link.

While it may sound like scaremongering - the long term affects are unknown is fact. That farmers receive little benefit is also fact. Sure more can be planted but that cost is swallowed up with the seed cost. Introducing it into Australia dooms us all - that is markets recognize we have high quality products such as wheat which don't come with GM uncertainties, we'd be better off keeping them 'pure' irrespective of whether they do harm because it differentiates our product (niche if you like) and it means our products arent met with consumer distrust.

I find myself disagreeing with most of your points, most of the advantages you have cited do not seem to be so great to me. Lets run through them.

  • In the past, food producers relied on a process called selective breeding to create more sustainable and efficient crops. This process takes generations, whereas GM can work overnight!

The organisms were selectively bred because they performed well in a given region. GM can do it overnight! is an oxymoron - we're talking long term, and youre missing the point - farmers in those region can keep on selecting the best for their region whereas the GM one is static, even if the GM one did evolve it can get worse. The ultimate application will probably mean industrial food system, more efficient/sustainable is also an oxymoron since the crop will be grown faster and more densely packed diminishing the earth faster..Ie less sustainable.

  • Selective breeding can only alter genes that already exist in a species, but GM makes it possible for the genes of other species to be used as well, greatly broadening the potential of this science.

You cover this in the flaws as well - of all the points one could make of GM it is probably the most valid. Being able to import fish genes into a species sounds like a worthwhile adaptation as long as it doesn't hit other ethical/health/environmental issues.Personally i do not think we are responsible enough or know what we are doing with this yet - just like feeding meat to cows.

  • GM crops require a lot less labour—farmers no longer need to till the soil, which in turn reduces soil erosion.
Bullshit. Tilling will still be required, the labour is relative when one farmer with tractor can plough howevermany acres. The labour savings come about because all the seeds form true. Standardised you can pack them in closer. Uniform height - easier to pick etc.

  • Due to their quality, GM crops need less processing and fewer additives.

Less processing, well my dear that depends on what you are making. A whole food like an apple doesnt need additives. Processing - above point. This all smacks of the splitting a food into it's component parts - id almost rephrase your point as is industry ready - go read the books i mentioned.

  • Crops can be equipped with ‘long lasting’ genes, preventing waste. For example a slow softening tomato has been produced that lasts longer!

I imagine it will taste like crap. Honestly, you buy a food - let it ripen, eat it when it's at it's optimum. I dont really want a product that has already lost it's nutrients/flavour but looks great. It also beggars the question of why it lasts longer - do the bacteria also find it repugnant?

  • GM crops use less pesticide, need less fertilizer and require less energy to process. A major player in the GM foods field, Monsanto, makes a potato whose genetically modified resistance to a local beetle supposedly saves 2,000 tonnes of pesticides, 180,000 containers and 150,000 gallons of fuel!

Well no, i believe that potato was baned from the Monsanto cafeteria - correct me if im wrong. Flip side - you have herbicide resistant crops that require even more pesticide - why? because you can just dowse your fields and soil chemistry be damned.

  • Main developments so far include crops that are pest, insect and disease resistant and that help to control weeds.

You partially cover this in the cons. But since its all standardized you risk wiping out the crop in one fell swoop. As for being resistant to insect/pests - generally i think this is done by crossing with tobacco - theres a problem with introducing poisons in a food system. Even if this wasnt the case - there has to be something wrong with it if a natural predator goes naaah rather not. As for weed control - weeds are not a problem but a symptom. Too much fertilizer? Water runnoff? Or just plain exposed earth - nature abhors vacuums.

  • Planned future developments include crops that are drought resistant, salt tolerant and protect themselves from frost damage.

Ties into your broad potential Pro point and the flaws. Again of all the GM benefits these are the only valid ones i can see.

  • Foods with higher protein, vitamins and minerals, less fat and cholesterol, and that last longer can be created.

We're in medieval times when it comes to understanding foods. Every so often we get food scientists saying it's okay to drink wine now (or whatever). This is a symptom of breaking a food into the various components and saying huzzah - we've found THE antioxidant, but raising the antioxidant or whatever doesnt adequately describe how it works in tandem with the other components of the plant.

  • Crops, such as peanuts, can be produced so they don’t contain the protein that many people are allergic to.

Honestly id be more concerned about what caused the allergies in the first place. What happens if 'normal' peanuts are mixed in.....itd be a tippsy topsy world eh, instead of May contain traces of GM - may contain traces of normal. Or warning labels - processed with eq that also proceesed normals (or however that warning label reads).

  • Some fruits can be manipulated to contain vaccines for diseases such as cholera and hepatitis. I thought vitamin C was already good for cholera, but what would i know. I dont know the implications on this, but i would think doses in a grown product can vary wildly. Traditionally we get our vaccines from an inert form of a virus, im not too hot on introducing it into a living organism - will it mutate?

Environment.

  • Currently, about a quarter of the world’s crops are lost each year due to insects. GM can produce pest resistant crops, which reduce the use of harmful pesticides.

You kindof touch on this with the Cons. Both in standardization and the 'poisoning' animals. I see this more on an issue of natural balance (which is already fragged) - if the prey is discouraged - so is the food source for more cuddly animals like the mouse->owl etc. And crop loss outside of drought etc can often be attributed to a more fundamental problem elsewhere....eg overplanting, mono crop, having killed off natural predators.

  • Plants that are more efficient at absorbing metals and radioactive elements can be developed to clean contaminated soil.
I read they have a plant that does this in Japan for some toxin or other. The problem here is the problem is now concentrated, much more toxic. Along comes the grazer....oops.

  • A plant in the mustard family has been modified to remove arsenic from soil. Potentially, it could help more than one million people who suffer from arsenic poisoning due to drinking contaminated water.
Neutralising garlic in your body can be done eating garlic (a clove a day) - My handy tip for today. On arsenic http://www.crccare.com/view/index.aspx?id=14980 South Australians found a bacteria that eats arsenic converting it to a less harmful/easier to clean form. The other thing Id mention about arsenic is that usually the problems are because the groundwater has been missused - naturally occuring, drawing up too much for concentrated problems.

  • Scientists still don’t know a lot about GM organisms. Who knows what the effects could be? Human consumption of GM foods hasn’t been happening for very long, so while now everything seems fine, in the future it could have bad effects.

As an update - GM is one of the most likely culprits on the bee dieoffs, US farmed salmon is also having problems with GM corn - but maybe they just dont like the corn. As an aside the wild salmon population has all but crashed. http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/13/america/sal...

makes me sad. Big problem in knowing the affects, it wont be found out in the US - their food labels dont say GM or GM free (since it infers GM is bad)* The sheer ammount of producs (of crap) makes the whole tracing a culprit to one source is problematic. Also most all of the testing is done by the companies selling the stuff, can we say vested interest.

  • When testing the foods for safety, only the portion that has been changed is tested, instead of the food as a whole. Yes that - but also we have no way of knowing long term affects till....well long term - does substance x motabilize or stay in muscle/fat - build up over time. How much substance x is safe.

  • GM crops can accidentally spread to neighbouring fields, spreading the GM traits and ruining the purity of organic crops. Well there are exclusion zones - 100m? couple of km.....What happens when a migratory bird has bits of pollen on its legs or wind that can blow pollen thousands of km's. There's that Canadian farmer who is or was being sued for having GM plants he sure didnt plant.

Kelly, I appreciate the time and effort it took you to write the article - I do, else i couldve just said bunk. As you can acertain my views are not neutral, not only because the hazards are hazy but because the promises of what GM means are usually snake oil. Will it feed the world - no. Btw the golden rice contains no more carotine than milled stuff according to the FDA.

  • Not entirely sure on its factuality - did think i read it somewhere and seems similar to the cloned animals as meat stuff.

-----

image

Yuilden 08-Apr-2008

-----

image

JB 27-Jan-2008

I was wondering if there is a petition we are able to sign to show our support for GM foods? anyone know?

-----

image

NM 09-Jul-2007

GM crops are not the way to go. For starters there is still so much we don’t know about genetic modification. So I think it is pointless to consider the advantages of GM, when there are some serious risks that could permanently change the way we live, we farm and the food we eat.

I also don’t think there is much of a choice for farmers because of pollination and spreading of genes. There is no way to isolate GE free farms from those using GE technology. Cross contamination from gene flows can happen quite easily, so even if farmers wanted to remain organic and keep their farms GE free, they might have little choice in being able to do this. Rather their farms would be infiltrated by GE strains.

Also GM crops do not necessarily require less herbicides and additives than non-GM crops. The GE herbicide resistant canola crops in Canada have been found to have helped develop superweeds that are herbicide resistant. So farmers are having to use even more toxic chemicals in order to kill weeds.

Also, as for the benefits for developing countries, maybe I’m being pessimistic, but surely the reasons why many of the issues like hunger and malnutrition exist in the developing world is not because of a shortage of GE crops, but because of many other problems that have to do core economic and political wrongs in our world today. We have enough food in the world to feed starving people, but have problems distributing it. We already waste so much. I would be very surprised if GE technology changed this.

And finally, there is no reason to mess with nature. We have unique and beautiful bio-diversity in Australia. A way of living off the environment has evolved over thousands of years, we don’t want to stuff it up more than we have already.

-----