Issue

Global poverty

Submitted by: Altin | 15 comments  VIEW COMMENTS


Photographer : Atom

The meaning of poverty

Imagine you are hungry but the fridge is empty and the shops are closed. Imagine you are thirsty but the taps aren’t working. Imagine you are sick, or someone you love is sick, but the doctors won’t see you. Imagine never having gone to school. Imagine needing a job really badly but not being able to get one, and not being able to go to anyone for help. You may still be unable to imagine what it means to live in poverty, but you’re getting there.

In 2005, an estimated 3 billion people—about half the world’s population—were living on less than US$2 a day. Every day, 30,000 children die from causes directly related to poverty. The vast majority of these people live in developing countries in Africa, Asia and South America.

You’ve probably heard some of those stats before, but here’s one you may not know: in 1998, about US$13 billion was spent worldwide on providing basic health and nutrition to the world’s poor. That’s not pocket change by any means, but that same year, Europeans alone spent US$50 billion on cigarettes, US$105 billion on booze and US$11 billion on ice cream. Now, I like ice cream as much as the next guy, but really … haven’t we got our priorities wrong?

Why does poverty exist?

The high standard of living we take for granted in Australia is the product of several hundred years of complex technological and social development. Much of this development has yet to take place in the countries most affected by poverty. Adequate hospitals and schools, reliable shelter, and easy access to food and water, simply do not exist, and very little is being done to put them in place. A lot of the hardships we associate with poverty are strongly linked to under-development. However, this is not the only reason for poverty.

In the countries most affected by poverty today, the experience of poverty is nothing new, but the problem has actually gotten worse over the last few centuries. In fact, many of the problems faced by African and Asian countries today are related to the fact that many of these countries were under Western colonial rule well into the twentieth century. As colonies, these countries were exploited for labour and resources in the interests of their colonial rulers. Very little was done by the government of the day to ensure people’s well-being, and colonial rule commonly saw a decline in living standards. Poverty today is often a legacy of yesterday’s injustice. And this injustice still continues. To this day, developed countries implement policies that make the developed world richer, while ignoring or even increasing poverty in the developing world.

How are wealthy countries helping to cause poverty?

Global trade and aid policies, driven by wealthy nations, have long had disastrous consequences for the peoples of poor nations. These policies often destroy traditional ways of life and balances within communities, that people in developing countries rely on to avoid the worst effects of poverty.

A good example is the way that imports of food from a rich country into a poor one can destroy local agriculture and trade. The imported food is often cheaper or better quality, meaning that locals can’t sell their produce at a price that will support them. A widespread decline into extreme poverty is often the result.

The 'Banana Republic'

This process is a bit easier to understand if you consider a practical example. Say you live in tropical Banania and make your living picking bananas. Since you’re a good banana picker, you can pick a hundred bananas a day. You sell each of your bananas for four cents at the local market. Half of this goes to the guy who grows the banana trees, and half is yours. Two cents per banana isn’t much, but you both manage to scrape by. Then, one day AustralianBananaCorp opens a stall at the market. Since they use machines to pick their bananas, and since they get funding from the Australian government, they can sell their bananas at two cents each. If you don’t cut your price in half, nobody will buy your bananas! On the other hand, if you do lower your price, both you and the banana-tree guy are in big trouble. If he can’t grow (and you can’t pick) twice as many bananas as usual, you’re both going to have trouble feeding yourselves. Unless you’re really fond of bananas, that is.

Ending poverty

Poverty is obviously an immense global problem, but it is not one without possible solutions. In 2000, the United Nations estimated that if developed countries dedicated as little as 0.7% of their Gross National Income to effective foreign aid every year, the number of people living in poverty would be halved by 2015. This amount is, of course, a tiny proportion of the national income; yet most developed countries give less than half this sum in aid. And even then, much of this aid comes with strings attached that are often not in a developing country’s best interests.

To tackle the problem of poverty head-on, developed nations will need to find better ways of working with the developing world, ways which improve living standards in developing countries and give them brighter hopes for their future. Whether this happens or not will depend on whether governments of wealthier countries, and we as citizens of those countries, are prepared to do what is in our power, to take a stand and put an end to poverty.
Discuss Now 15 comments View all 1 2 3

AndreaL7 27-Jul-2008

I agree with funnelweb to an extent. The issue of global poverty must be attacked from a political standpoint combined with groups like Oxfam, World Vision, Save the Children etc... We definately still need caring individuals working with those striken by poverty face-to-face because of the relationships it creates; but if politicians and world leaders fail to recognize this issue as a growing problem, it is true- nothing will ever change. We need to see both a hands on approach, so that those people in third world countries realize that people from Western nations still care and are trying to help, but we also need those individuals who hold powerful political and economic positions in society to take action- money can only go so far and if its tied up in political dispute, by the time they realize the importance and urgency of this situation, many people will have died.

RebeccaS 27-Mar-2008

I think that the 180 nations involved in the 2000 UN Millennium Summit need to stick to their promise of donating .7% of their GNP in order to decrease global poverty. Most nations have not stuck to the agreement, which means that other actions could and should be taken. Unfortunately, when donating aid, governments sometimes look not at who the poorest nations are, but what nation has the most to offer economically. If government won't step in, taking part and donating to organisations like Oxfam and Amnesty International is worthwhile.

xLoveWins 30-Dec-2007

Everything counts. IT may not be easily solved. But thats where we need to stand up and help. I no that we may not have enough money to stop poverty but we have time and we are caring so we can go out and do mission trips and donate. Also raising money for people living in poverty is great. My school is involved in the 40 hour famine and its suprising to see that almost all of my skewl was involved. I think we can slowly elimante poverty so lets be hopeful and pray. AND DO some work to help

ethicool 14-Sep-2007

there are many good points here, but i agree with Artenor. Global poverty will not be easily solved, the attitudes of people wont change over night, people will still only donate what they believe they can afford whilst keeping their lifestyle. And funnelweb has some great points too. I believe in hope. We have to keep hope and faith that the little things do make a difference. Working with people in Africa, India and Thailand I know first hand that their lives are changed by us trading fairly with them. Their children can go to school, they can eat, they get training, they have re-learnt traditional cultures and skills that were deemed worthless... So even though by starting ethiCooL I am not saving the world, I am helping the lives or those I work with and hopefully people will see the purpose of this & decide to purchase these products instead of sweatshop produced, over priced labels. The more people support the producers, the more people ethiCooL can work with. This is not charity. This is giving them a chance to work and receive fair pay and working conditions and the chance to dream about their future. And the stuff they do is great!
edun-live is a great concept by Bono & his wife. I have their t-shirts in my range. They are working to raise the global trade of Africa to help reduce poverty. It is not donations. It is providing the opportunity to produce growe-seller cotton tee's in Africa and then export them. Africa's global trade is currently at 2%. If it can be raised by only one percentage point then the contiinent would earn an extra $70 BILLION in exports each year!
edun-live sold it's one millionth tee last week! doesn't it make you think that maybe, just maybe it is possible to help Africa get that 1%....

funnelweb 16-Jun-2007

Arty, I am not kicking the initiatives that are being tried, but I would like to challenge people to come up with ideas other than monetary donations. Would money stop the genocides in Dafur or the wars in the Congo or the malnutrition of North Korea? I believe a global solution is needed for a global problem. Yet every time global leaders meet to discuss strategies to combat the problem you get riots in the streets (most recently Germany). I believe the answer is in diplomacy. I totally support the work done by groups like Oxfam and others, in fact I used to quote them often in my university presentations. But their good work is being hindered by the non-democratic regimes that cause the suffering and poverty. I think the rich world should send doctors, teachers, engineers, investment bankers, financial planners...the people that make the wheels of the economy turn...those which we take for granted. Our local GP for instance? A rarity in a place like Mozambique.

You say I was being negative. I was actually being positive about the benefits of globalisation, the benefits which should be shared with poor countries. I think S11 and those groups are negative and do not provide any helpful contribution. This is my opinion and if we all had the same view then what fun would ActNow be? I don't pretend to be an expert on the matter, but I do like to give people an opposing view to think about and suggest solutions other than monetary donations be considered, because it would seem that they aren't working as well as we would like.