Issue

Little Children are Sacred

The Little Children are Sacred report, released in June 2007, addressed the issue of child abuse in Northern Territory Indigenous communities. What did the report find and how has the government and the community responded?

Submitted 26/06/2007 By actnow Views 100426 Comments 8 Updated 23/08/2007


Photographer : EnKayTee @ flickr

This page was written by ActNow member nickcox

What did the report find?

In June 2007, a groundbreaking report into the sexual abuse of children in some Indigenous communities of the Northern Territory (NT) was released. Emerging from the Inquiry into the Protection of Aboriginal Children from Sexual Abuse, the Little Children Are Sacred report presented a picture of communities ridden by violence, drugs, pornography and sexual abuse, all fuelled by "rivers of grog".

Lack of education and alcoholism were identified as the main causes of child abuse in NT Indigenous communities. Stories from the report included children being exposed to hardcore pornographic videos at home and seeing adults having sex at home, thereby desensitising children to sexual behaviour. Local police officers were accused of turning a blind eye to a "rampant informal sex trade" between Aboriginal girls aged 12 to 15 and non-Aboriginal local mineworkers, who paid the girls in alcohol, cash and other goods. Alcohol was used as a "bartering tool" by black and white men for sex with under-age girls.

What was the Australian Government's response to the report?

The release of Little Children Are Sacred was widely reported in the Australian media. Prime Minister, John Howard—on the advice of Indigenous Affairs Minister, Mal Brough—declared that his government would address the child abuse highlighted by the report as a matter of “national emergency”. Using its constitutional powers to override the direction of the NT Government, Howard announced a seven point plan to address the problem. This included:

  • Restrictions on welfare so parents spend their money on food and other necessities and not alcohol. Family welfare payments would be linked to children's school attendance.
  • A six month ban on the sale of alcohol in most of the concerned Indigenous communities.
  • A ban on the sale and possession of hardcore pornography, which was seen as “rife in Aboriginal communities”.
  • Medical checks for sexual abuse for Indigenous children younger than 16. Whilst the checks are voluntary, Health Minister ,Tony Abbott  has suggested that the welfare payments of parents might be reduced if their children are not examined. Around 11,000 children will be examined by the end of 2007.
  • A permit system restricting non-Aboriginal access to Indigenous land would be scrapped. Howard said made the permit system made it easier for abuse to go undiscovered.
  • Proposing leglisation to enable the government to acquire five year leases for over 64 Indigenous communities in return for compensation.
  • Extra police provided by the federal and state governments will investigate sexual abuse in the communities.


What was the response to the government's plan from other political parties and the community?
 

Federal Labor leader Kevin Rudd immediately pledged the broad cooperation of his party in addressing the problem, qualifying that Labor would scrutinise the details of any legislation. Rudd indicated that Labor’s response would focus on the origins of the problem, offering money to ensure that all Indigenous schoolchildren would attend school regularly.

Some criticisms were made towards the details of the government’s policy. The Australian Medical Association said there were "nowhere near enough doctors" in the NT to conduct medical checks for the estimated 23,000 children.

The authors of the Little Children are Sacred report—former Northern Territory Director of Public Prosecutions, Rex Wild QC and senior Aboriginal health worker, Pat Anderson—started that the measures put forward by the government were significantly different to the 97 recommendations they made. ANTaR National Director, Gary Highland said that the government response seemed to ignore the findings of the report that non-Aboriginal men were also responsible for the abuse of Aboriginal children. Mr Highland said that the Prime Minister was right to describe the widespread abuse of Aboriginal children as a national emergency but wrong in the way his government was seeking to overcome it.

Australian Democrats leader Andrew Bartlett said the plan would “take control of Aboriginal lives without consultation”. Queensland premier Peter Beattie said Indigenous parents should be involved in any plans to improve social conditions in communities. "Let's not become savages in this; we need to involve the community." In particular Beattie described the six-month alcohol ban as a "silly gimmick".

Other critics believe that the Federal Government is using its response to Little Children Are Sacred as an excuse for a ‘land grab’. Arrente elder Pat Turner says that the “government is using child sexual abuse as the Trojan horse to resume total control of our land."

Anglicare Australia questioned why it had taken so long for the government to recognise an issue that community organisations had advocated for 20 years. West Australian Premier, Alan Carpenter, described Howard’s sudden interest in the issue as “another Tampa" to enhance the Coalition’s chances in the upcoming federal election. "If he thinks it's an emergency, one could ask the question: why hasn't he done anything about it in the last 11 years? This is designed to create an issue for Mr Howard to run on."

However, Indigenous leader and former Labor president, Warren Mundine, dismissed this criticism, saying the protection of children is more important than politics. To Mundine, people who claimed the Prime Minister was being driven by political motives missed the point: the vulnerable needed protection. "I take Mr Howard's motives at face value. I am quite happy to accept it may be a cynical exercise in his re-election. I don't care. What I want to use that for is to get some real outcomes for Aboriginal women and children".

How do I know this?

Inquiry into the Protection of Aboriginal Children from Sexual Abuse 2007, Little Children Are Sacred, www.nt.gov.au/dcm/inquirysaac/pdf/bipacsa_final_report.pdf 

The Age 2007, It’s Our Hurricane Katrina Says Emotion Charged PM, June 25, http://www.theage.com.au/articles
 
The Age 2007, Abbott looks at compulsory health checks, July 2, http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/abbott-looks-at-compulsory-health-checks

The Age 2007, Government softens stance on child health checks, July 6, http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/
government-softens-stance-on-child-health-checks

The Age 2007, Canberra offers to send troops for WA crackdown, July 11, http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/canberra-offers-to-send-troops-for-wa-crackdown/2007/07/10/1183833527342.html

The Age 2007, Aboriginal group lashes PM's plan, July 11, http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/aboriginal-group-lashes-pms-plan

The Australian 2007, Howard, Rudd dodge indigenous 'land grab' claims, June 29, http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story

Crikey 2007, Howard's land grab: The (d)evil is in the permit detail, June 28, http://www.crikey.com.au/Politics/20070628-Howards-land-grab-the-devil-in-the-permit-detail-.html  

John Howard 2007, Transcript, June 21, http://www.crikey.com.au/Politics

The Age 2007, Plan faces NT legal challenge, July 10, http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/plan-faces-nt-legal-challenge

Sydney Morning Herald 2007, NT sexual health checks are 'voluntary', July 10, http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/NT-sexual-health-checks-are-voluntary

Sydney Morning Herald 2007, PM accused of black land grab, July 9, http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/pm-accused-of-black-land-grab/2007/07/09/1183833415790.html

ANTaR 2007, Government’s misguided approach will add to trauma of children http://www.antar.org.au/content/view/433/1/

Discuss Now

Post Comment 1 | 2 |

RSS Comments
image

VibewirePROJECTeye 15-Jul-2008

If you have an opinion or viewpoint you'd like to share with the rest of the world about WYD '08, visit http://www.projecteye.org .

PROJECTeye, in partnership with SBS, will provide an opportunity for people from diverse religious, regional and cultural backgrounds to be heard worldwide.

Black Jesus, Inquisition, Pilgrims gone AWOL turning up in the gutter, its all on PROJECTeye.org.

Create your own coverage and engage with the rest of the world on the biggest event of 2008.

-----

image

Marlabungu 22-Aug-2007

Why did the federal government have to abolish the permit system in order to protect Aboriginal children. The Aboriginal Land Rights (1976) Act was originally amended to provide Aboriginal people with economic independce. However, now it appears that it was amended to abolish a permit system to allow access that had already existed.

Why would anyone blindly believe that the federal government is now doing something good when Aboriginal people are an economic burden and a bad memory of their past?


-----

image

Jacquie 17-Aug-2007

Sidney, I can't pretend to identify with what you're saying but I acknowledge that all things happen within a political context. Noel Pearson admitted that while the federal intervention wasn't perfect, he would accept any initiative designed to try to stop child abuse because Australian governments have been inactive for too long - and we're talking decades of non-action. So while the Howard Government is flawed and we can't ignore that this is happening in an election year after years of inaction, finally something is being done.

And I don't think the Australian public will let the Howard Government "reinvade" Aboriginal land. Things have changed, people's thinking has changed, and no longer will Australians be complicit in the crimes some governments might commit.

-----

image

funnelweb 15-Aug-2007

Sidney - are you suggesting protecting children from horrible atrocities a "reinvasion"? In all you have said, not once did you acknowledge that there is a serious problem there and that it ever had any real chance of being dealt with by traditional land owners. Come on - surely the well-being of Children comes first?

Great article btw!

-----

image

Marlabungu 14-Aug-2007

Great site crew – I hope my comments are not too long.

All children are sacred and that goes without saying, but should that stop me from speaking out against the recent re-invasion of our land – NO absolutely NOT. I spent my childhood living in remote Aboriginal communities and these were the happiest years of my life. Most of these communities were previous government missions that evolved into dysfunctional communities. The federal government set-up these communities for assimilative purposes, as they wanted Aboriginal people to assimilate with the wider and fast-growing population of white immigrated settlers. The government has known for years that over-crowded houses leads to a poverty cycle based on social dysfunction. They have known of the child abuse, they have known of the substance abuse, they have known for YEARS. So why now? why the sudden interest to destroy a permit system that protected Aboriginal lands from exactly what is happening now. Why, because it is common knowledge that the sea will rise, due to melting ice and the major populations in Australia are located on low-lying cities or coastal townships. Because you need Uranium in order to produce clean-green, Nuclear Energy. Because you need the untouched and vast amount of minerals such as diamonds resting within ancient volcanic landscapes. Because you need to continue to destroy ancient peoples culture, which connects them to the rights to that land. I am so sick and tired of a federal government that lies, deceives and turns people against each other just to cover up the hidden agenda of filthy rich men. They set-us-up-to-fail from the beginning and now they are using this failure to dictate, oppress and create a white-wash of media frenzied propaganda.

I am frustrated, furious, ashamed, sad, disheartened and I would fall on my knees and accept death as a heavenly option – if only I didn’t have three little children who need their dad to man-up and be strong for the long hard battle ahead. I will not let my children grow up in a world that is dictated by white men with forked tongues who are pretending to be the saviours of our children.

A snake may shed his skin, but he is still a snake.

Sidney (Ngarritj) Watts

-----