Issue

Refugees & asylum seekers in detention

What makes someone a refugee? And why are they put into detention? Confused about this issue? Check this out...

Submitted 10/11/2005 By Bridie Views 332090 Comments 6 Updated 4/06/2008

Who is a refugee?

An asylum seeker is someone who makes a claim for asylum (legal and physical protection) in a state apart from his or her own. The terms refugee and asylum seeker are often used interchangeably because most refugees are at some point asylum seekers. People move from asylum seeker status to refugee status once the state accepts their claim of asylum.

The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees defines a refugee as someone who:

"owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality, and is unable to or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country..."

This means that someone is defined as a refugee if they are outside their home country because they fear punishment or harassment, for the reasons listed above, and cannot be protected by their government.

To learn more about the difference between asylum seeker, refugee, migrant and displaced person, click here.

Why are they put in detention?

Within Australia

According to the Australian Migration Act, 1958, all persons within Australian borders must be detained if they do not possess either a valid visa or Australian citizenship.

Seeking asylum is not illegal, however Australia’s visa system is complex and makes it hard for refugees to apply successfully. Legal assistance and advice is not automatically made available to asylum seekers detained in detention, unless they ask for it. Apart from often having poor English language skills, most asylum seekers are not familiar with Australian law. They do not know they have the right to ask, how to ask, or that it is in their best interest to ask for legal assistance. They have little or no knowledge of the consequences of failing to ask, and migration officers have no obligations to inform them of any consequences.

Australias obligations to the United Nations (UN)

Australia became a signatory to the Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees in 1954 and 1973 respectively. Australia is therefore obligated to provide protection to both asylum seekers and refugees. Although Australia’s conditions for granting refugee status are in line with UN conditions in many ways, there are a number of areas where Australia has been criticised by the international community. Organisations such as Amnesty International, Oxfam and the UN have criticised Australia for deviating from the criteria, both directly and indirectly, by not upholding the spirit of the treaty.

Australia does this by having mandatory detention, discriminating between different groups of asylum seekers (this violates Article 31), and manipulating the definitions within the convention and protocol. These documents stipulate that a country must not change the definition of ‘refugee’. However, as of 2001, Australia altered the legal definition of ‘persecution’, resulting in fewer asylum seekers classified as refugees (this violates Articles 26 and 31).

Australia has also exploited UN protocol by liberally interpreting its guidelines in the development of legislature around the process for determining refugee status. (The process is not outlined by the UN).

To read the Convention, go to http://www.ohchr.org/english/law/refugees.htm

To read the Protocol, go to http://www.ohchr.org/english/law/protocolrefugees.htm

Who decides?

The Department of Immigration sets the limits on the number of people who can be accepted into Australia as refugees. Although the decision is reported to parliament, it is not determined by any laws. Australia’s quota has remained between approximately 12,000 and 13,000 people for the last 10 years.

Where do the asylum seekers go?

While in Australia, detainees are placed in a variety of facilities. The main facilities include Immigration Detention Centres (Villawood, Maribyrnong and Perth); an Immigration Detention Facility (Baxter); an Immigration Reception and Processing Centre (Christmas Island); or a Residential Housing Project (Port Augusta). Detainees can also be held in other places such as correctional facilities, watch houses, hotels, apartments, foster care and community hospitals.

The number of people detained, including details on the number of men, women and children in detention is updated weekly and can be viewed at http://www.immi.gov.au/detention/facilities

Can Australia send people back if their request is rejected?

According to UN policy asylum seekers whose petitions are rejected can be sent back to their own country. However, if there is war or conflict there, the UN strongly urges nations not to send people back. In Australia, this means that people remain in detention centres if their claim is rejected and they cannot be sent home. They can, however, appeal the decision made about them. They remain in detention while this is going on.

Is it a just Australia ?

The issue of refugees and asylum seekers in detention centres is not restricted to Australia—although Australia’s policy on refugees and asylum seekers has, according to Macolm Fraser, been internationally criticised.

How do I know this

Australian Broadcasting Commission 2001, Geraldine Doogue Interviews James Jupp on Radio National’s Life Matters Program, 4 September, http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/lm/stories/s356981.htm

Australian Lawyers for Human Rights, http://www.alhr.asn.au/refugeekit/downloads/chapte...

Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, http://www.immi.gov.au/statistics/index.htm

Fraser M 2002, 'The big lies of ‘border protection'', The Age, March 27, http://www.theage.com.au/cgi-bin/common/popupPrint...

The Refugee Council of Australia, http://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/html/facts_and_st...

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, http://www.ohchr.org/english/law/protocolrefugees.htm

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, http://www.ohchr.org/english/law/refugees.htm

Discuss Now

Post Comment 1 | 2 |

RSS Comments
image

adrienne 20-Dec-2007

once for a school excursion we tried to visit a detention centre in nsw and it was the most terrible thing! u could see the barbed wire, the place was out in the middle of nowhere, it was lonely. We were not granted access into the detention centre but it was so heartbreaking to think that families were imprisoned in there sometimes even for years!

-----

image

funnelweb 23-Apr-2007

Is Australia the only country with detention centres? Well, most countries use prisons for illegal aliens found to be without visas. The UK is adopting the Australian model, the french have the problem with northern france being one enormous ghetto of Algerian and Moroccan assylum seekers.

I believe it is our moral responsibility to explore why in the 21st century there are so many refugees? SHould our responsibility not be to help these people in their own homes and find out why they are refugees? Detentions are actually not for refugees, they are for those who are unable to be identified, in many cases pay for a trip to Australia and dispose of their paperwork/passports. What do you do in those cases? Should they be given preferential treatment to genuine refugees? I am just wondering what others think?

-----

image

JAAAZY 06-Mar-2007

Its horrible to know that Australia is the only country with detention centres.

Well, that's what I was told. If it's true, then it's a shame.

-----

image

doreen 02-Jun-2006

For information on the refugee and asylum seeker policies of Australia and other countries around the world, try looking at the annual country reports prepared by the United States Committee of Refugees (available at the Committee's website at http://www.uscr.org).

-----

image

Thao P 21-Apr-2006

Thank you for making the issue so clear and understandable. Perhaps you could also put Australia's asylum seeker policy in perspective by comparing the number of people we accept with those accepted by other countries such as Pakistan.

Also, where you have discussed the question of whether Australia can send people back if their request is denied, it may be useful to consider indefinite detention and what happens to those who effectively cannot be removed.

-----