Issue

Workers unions

Unions have always played a big part in Australian history—but are they still fighting for our rights or just becoming a hindrance to earning more money in our market economy?

Submitted 22/03/2006 By brods Views 34080 Comments 5 Updated 12/11/2007


Caption : AMWU Rally Sydney Town Hall
Photographer : Mushroom and Rooster

The role of workers’ unions in Australian industrial relations has become a hot topic. Unions are fighting as hard as ever to make sure they do not become obsolete as a result of industrial relations reform.

So what is a workers’ union?

  • Unions are organisations set up by employees to help them at work. They are based on the idea that much more can be achieved by working together than as individuals. At work, unions give employees a voice. They do this by assisting them to gain better pay, improved working standards, safe working environments and employment security.
  • Unions are an important ingredient in maintaining a fair and balanced workplace. They did not come about by accident. Unions were formed by concerned workers who wanted to defend themselves from exploitation and improve their lifestyle.
  • Approximately two million Australians are union members—that’s about 25% of the full-time workforce.
  • There are more than 50 unions in Australia representing many different industries (ACTU Worksite, 2003).

Who is involved?

  • Any employee in any industry in Australia (except the defence forces) can join a union.
  • A number of unions exist in Australia, aligned under the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU).

Why should we have unions?

  • Unions claim that union members have better wages and conditions than non-union members.
  • Unionised workplaces can have better health and safety conditions than non-union workplaces. They are also more likely to elect representatives who are legally entitled to monitor health and safety at work.
  • Unions have a history of defending the rights of working women, part-time and casual workers. It is much more difficult for employers to discriminate against employees who are aware of their rights.
  • Overtime rates, annual leave, rostered days off, redundancy agreements and long- service leave payments are all conditions fought for by unions. Employers tend not to just hand out entitlements.
  • Unions support education and training for employees and lobby for on-the-job training for members.
  • The union movement has successfully lobbied state and federal governments for better laws to protect low-paid workers.
  • Employers may try to cut jobs and increase productivity in tough economic times. Unions make sure that big companies don't put profit before people.
  • Unions are involved in important social and community issues. These include the environment, the women's movement, Aboriginal reconciliation, rebuilding East Timor, overseas aid and rights for refugees (Victorian Trades Hall Council, 2006).

Why shouldn’t we have unions?

  • Individual contracts between the employer and the employee may be more beneficial for the employee without the interference of the union.
  • There has been a shift from traditional employment to independent contracting, consulting and self-employment (IPA, 2005).
  • Some unions have been accused of using violence, intimidation or bullying tactics.
  • Some people fear unions are too powerful or corrupt, and that if they gain more power it would come at the expense of local businesses and employees.
  • Political parties that receive funds from unions may be influenced by this and shift the party's focus from the national interest to the union leaders' interests.

How do I know this?

ACTU Worksite for Schools, http://www.worksite.actu.asn.au/index.php3

Liberal Party of Australia, http://www.liberal.org.au/

Unions and related sites, http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/unions/unions.html

Victorian Trades Hall Council, http://www.vthc.org.au/index.cfm

Institute of Public Affairs, http://www.ipa.org.au/files/news_1038.html

Discuss Now

Post Comment

RSS Comments
image

oolong 08-Apr-2008

In reply to Kelly Simpson's comment, the reasons you put forward to join the union is part of the reason I didn't join the union.

The union I was meant to join as a worker at Franklins, the SDA, have a whole range of discounts for the union member, but what are they actually doing as a UNION?

If I wanted a discount book to help me as a CONSUMER, I would go out and get one (I wouldn't need a union for that). But a union is something that is there to help me as a PRODUCER.

I'd much prefer my union not to be a supporter of youth wages and actually do something constructive to reduce the inequality between the worker and employer. To be there fighting alongside me for better pay and more power.

-----

image

Kelly Simpson 15-Feb-2008

As well as work benefits, union members can receive benefits in many other areas of their lives too.
My grandparents are members of the Transport Workers Union, though they've been retired for thirty years. Yet they still receive benefits in the form of this insanely packed coupon book which gives you free visits to OceanWorld, 2 for 1 pizzas at pizza places and a vast amount and variety of other discounts. Sometimes I wonder whether people would be so opposed to joining unions if they knew that this amount of free stuff was involved.
To the next person who says 'it's not free, because you pay for it'
Well they pay thirty dollars a year. We've had pizza twice and the savings more than cover that.

-----

image

funnelweb 05-Nov-2007

Too right Gez!
Yes Unions to have an important role to play, but we must all be mindful that we also have a right NOT to be a member of a Union and not be harrassed for exercising that right. Some of us may wish to bargain individually and want to be rewarded for performance rather than earn the same as the next guy who isn't as efficient.

-----

image

gez 21-Aug-2007

I love the line "Political parties that receive funds from unions may be influenced by this and shift the party's focus from the national interest to the union leaders' interests."
Its completely true so long as people keep in mind the enormous donations that both major parties recieve from any number of different sectors, such as gambling companies, hoteliers associations, development companies, media companies. However despite the growing concern about the possible effect of these influences they want to increase the amount anonymously donatable to a political party. But of course thats only to clear red tape, not because they dont want people knowing where their money's coming from.

Hmm maybe I might write this its own section, if it doesnt already exist.

-----

image

whosaidwhatnow 21-Mar-2007

-----