funnelweb

image
Name:
I live: Sydney

ABOUT ME:

I am passionate about politics and world affairs. I completed a Bachelor of Economics at Macquarie Uni and a Masters of Law at Sydney Uni. I currently work in financial services and enjoy the challenges of my job.

I have been involved with ActNow and Inspire for about 3years and am associated with two other charitable foundations concerned with issues impacting on young people today. What I like most about ActNow is that it encourages young people to be active about issues they are passionate about and share their stories, experiences and opinions with like-minded individuals in a friendly and supportive environment. People won't always agree with what you say, and that's the beauty about living in a democracy - you are free to share your point of view and be heard.

ActNow helps young people help themselves and provides that starting point to make a difference. It provides sources and tools to fight the battles, and be sure that there are others out there just like you. If you want something hard enough in this life and you're prepared to do what it takes, anything is possible. The time to Act is Now!

's blog

RSS Blog

View all entries

International Refugee Day 21-06-2007 12:09

Hi all, June 20 was international refugee day. The UNHCR is asking that we dig in deep to help give for those most in need. There are over 25million refugees at this moment worldwide living in substandard conditions, many suffering malnutrition, disease and extreme famine. If we all lent a hand and gave just $50 a year, the world would be a safer and happier place, and there would be no poverty.

Read 0 comments  |   |  Post comment

IR Minister 01-06-2007 07:24

Just curious, would anyone see a conflict at all, supposing Kevin Rudd wins this year's federal election (as is widely expected) and appoints Greg Combet (most likely candidate) as Minister of Employment and Industrial Relations? He is afterall Secretary of the ACTU (which today represents less than 17% of the workforce) and is a supporter of militant unionism. It is interesting.

Read 2 comments  |   |  Post comment

Amnesty International for whom? 23-05-2007 11:05

Am reading today's  herald: <http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21783399-1702,00.html>
Irene Khan of Amnesty International says John Howard is worse than Robert Mugabe.  I am sure many users on this site are keen supporters of Amnesty International. I am interested in your thoughts of such a highly publicised assertion.

Read 0 comments  |   |  Post comment

Zimbabwe and Cricket 13-05-2007 05:52

This whole 'should the Australian cricket team go to Zimbabwe' fiasco shouldn't even be an issue as far as I am concerned as the answer should be pretty obvious. I don't see England or New Zealand making this issue so controversial as it has become here. Sending the world's greatest cricket team to tour a country run by this anti-democratic, corrupt regime would be giving recognition as though a friendly neighbour and ignoring the on-going attrocities committed by Robert Mugabe. It would no doubt feed the propaganda machine which continues to censor people from the truth and brew hate against the rest that allows people to accept their mistreatment. Isolation might be the only answer. It is only by donations of other countries that any people at all receive food or money, and even then, only Mugabe supporters are prioritised. It is a sad, sorry situation, so why would we even contemplate sending against their will our cricket team? What have we becoming when we contemplate such things because of money?

Read 0 comments  |   |  Post comment

Kyoto or not Kyoto 26-04-2007 11:06

Although Australia has not ratified the protocol, it is performing far better than many countries that have in terms of reducing greenhouse emissions and is well on track to meeting global targets while maintaining enough flexibility to explore other options such as clean coal, nuclear energy and solar power. Kyoto will not work unless the world's three largest polluters also sign: USA, China, India. I do note though that in NSW, the ALP Government is building a Desalination Plant (possibly 2-3 more in southern and northern NSW) which is likely to have a major impact on carbon emissions so perhaps we might not meet our targets afterall. In addition, the ALP has reduced train services by a third and cut back on buses while motorways continue to be built - it is no wonder there are 2.5 cars to every household in Sydney.

Read 0 comments  |   |  Post comment

Reconciliation Issues 25-04-2007 10:59

I am very interested to hear from anyone who has any idea on how reconciliation might be achieved? I agree, it is our responsibility as Australians but how? Kev- you say it's about recognising indigenous claims for native title, well that is a matter for the courts not us. But let me tell you something, there is no evidence whatsoever that native title has improved the living conditions of Aborigines. You cannot lease, subdivide, place a mortgage on or transfer native title. There is evidence that native title post being granted is rife with corruption and internal politics.

I would argue that indigenous Australians need to be treated as equals, they need free access to education, medicine, food, housing, employment opportunities. Now, there's a long path to reconciliation and as much as some people may hate to admit it, reconciliation takes two, and no amount of saying 'sorry' for past misdeeds will improve their health standards and welfare.

Read 2 comments  |   |  Post comment

An injustice 25-04-2007 10:53

I'm reading in the paper that Margaret Cuneen, the prosecutor involved in the gang rapes was dismissed from a supreme court case due to her "bias" and "unfairness towards the accused", whom the jury were not told was already previously convicted of two other gang rape cases and was appealing for the third time this particular case. His two brothers are also behind bars for gang rape. The standing in prosecutor was given only a week to prepare his case, and as one would expect, his case was not adequately prepared and the accused was acquitted. I'm concerned about this precedent. Ironically the reason the public prosecutor was found to be bias was she gave a speech at a University saying she believed that the pendulum was swinging too far in favour of the criminal without considering the victim. In many cases people are being let off on minor technicalities in the face of overwhelming evidence, and the victim is left to live in fear. What are your thoughts?

Read 1 comments  |   |  Post comment

There are no comments for this post