Australiafication Imminent

Does knowing your 'wattle' from your 'wombat' make you a better candidate for Australian citizenship?

Submitted 7/11/2007 By Fuller Views 8815 Comments 2 Updated 29/11/2007


Photographer : jnxyz@flickr

Get ready everyone, if you thought you were an Australian living with other Australians in Australia before, ooh boy, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet. That wacky bunch in charge just kicked it up a notch with a new citizenship test! That’s right. Things are about to get Australiafied.

The Australian citizenship test commenced on 1 October 2007. While being criticised by some, namely me, as being point-scoring politics with little or no practical value, the Department of Immigration and Citizenship argues the test promotes social cohesion and successful integration into the community. They say the test will help people who want to become Australian citizens understand the country’s values, traditions, history and national symbols. I’m just glad I don’t have to do it, I’d have no chance.

These values, according to the Becoming an Australian Citizen resource book, include ‘a fair go’, and ‘mateship’. Could there really be cultures somewhere with no concept of fairness or friendliness? I would be more inclined to agree with Jack Marx of The Daily Truth: ‘Mateship is nonsense. It's about as uniquely Australian as oxygen, or getting dressed for work in the morning.’

‘The citizenship test is all about demonstrating that you understand the privilege of being an Australian,’ said Immigration Minister Kevin Andrews, who has been privileged by sheer accident of location of birth. ‘Requiring would-be citizens to commit to Australia is important and it would never be implemented by a Labor government,’ continued the Sale, Victoria born minister.

For a government seeking popularity, it’s not hard to see where this test came from. There are certain members of the community who, to put it as diplomatically as possible, wish to see some kind of action being taken in regards to perceived cultural ‘tensions’. And there are others, probably of a more reasonable nature, who consider the pre-existing requirements for citizenship to be more than adequate—such as living in Australia for more than two years (it’s now four), disclosing any prior convictions and attending an interview session.

The test also asks some fairly unimportant questions, practically speaking. For example, I have been getting along fine up until now without realising that it’s apparently my duty as an Australian citizen to ‘join with Australians to defend Australia and it’s way of life, should the need arise.’

Actually I’m still not sure what that implies.

No, ridicule is the most this test deserves—I find it impossible to take seriously that which, as articulated by Lyn Allison, Leader of the Democrats ‘means that people who might be hard working, good hearted and committed to this country could be denied the right to vote because they did not know that the golden wattle is our national floral emblem.’ Do we honestly think there will be any measurable difference in migrant integration because new citizens will be able to connect the name ‘Bradman’ to the right sport?

It’s a political move and a pretty transparent one at that. ‘These tests will prove nothing and achieve nothing beyond wedging the Labor Party in a cynical use of race politics,’ said Greens senator, Kerry Nettle. ‘The Prime Minister is deliberately trying to create the false impression that there is a problem with the quality of migrants we are getting into Australia, when the reality is quite the opposite.’ The Greens submission to the Minister's Citizenship Discussion Paper process detailed how in fact migrants' English language proficiency has significantly improved over the term of the Howard government.

There’s an election looming though so maybe hardline nationalist policies like this one will soon be replaced by vague, noncommittal ones. Here’s hoping!

How do I know this?

Department of Immigration and Citizenship, 2007, ‘How do I prepare for the test?’, citizenship.gov.au
http://www.citizenship.gov.au/test/index.htm

Cath Hart, 10 October 2007 ‘Citizenship test a walkover for 80pc’, The Australian www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22560775-5013404,00.html  

Lyn Allison, 28 September, 2007, ‘Citizenship Test is the new Aussie cringe’, ABC News http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/09/28/2045805.htm

Jack Marx, 15 September 2006 ‘Mates my arse’, The Daily Truth, The Sydney Morning Herald http://blogs.smh.com.au/thedailytruth/archives/
2006/09/mates_my_arse.html


Kerry Nettle 13 December 2006, ‘Citizenship test nothing more than cynical wedge politics’, greens.org.au
http://nsw.greens.org.au/media-centre/news-releases/citizenship-test-nothing-more-than-cynical-wedge-politics

Discuss Now

Post Comment

RSS Comments
image

Rach 12-Nov-2007

I agree it's pretty nuts (awesome article, btw!). I saw an episode of that shpw "Are you smarter than a 5th grader' and there was a questiona asking like 'what is Australia's national flower?'. As someone who has not-too-recently left the Australian education system, I should be on top of that kind of thing - but, alas, had no idea. At all. I'd hate to think that someone from overseas had to answer such questions which are firstly not relevant to Australian daily life, and secondly, if it is, is relevant to sub-cultural groups in Australia (like Don Bradman's career. My Dad knows all about it, but I couldn't care less). I think it's so true that "Australian values" are shared by pretty much everyone. It's almost implying some races or nationalities don't have 'values', and we need to find those who do have values and label them as ours.
In the end, I think we all need to be aware that people overseas, and those moving here, aren't that different from us. It's about communication, understanding cultures, and being aware that there isn't an essential 'badness' in people which we are trying to prevent. People are people, irrespective of what label we may or may not define them by. We only define things to define ourselves - but we need to remember people are multifaceted. Maybe it's best to say, instead of 'I'm not like that person or culture', but rather, 'that particular trait that that individual has, isn't one that I have.'
Boxing people up is problematic.
And so is getting people to fill in boxes: especially if it's only purpose to to confine people.

-----

image

Meli 12-Nov-2007

I agree, the test is ridiculous.

Sure, it’s important that when moving to a new country you become familiar with what goes on (laws, holidays, general cultural stuff etc.).

But the test asks questions which aren’t very relevant and many Australians would have trouble answering them.

Like you said, what are Aussie values anyway and what’s with the implication that other countries are lacking these?

-----