There's a terrorist behind you!

Not only is the fear of terrorism irrational and false, it’s downright dangerous, argues Benny.

Submitted 6/12/2007 By Benny89 Views 28393 Comments 6 Updated 6/12/2007


Photographer : GadgetGirl@Flickr


I left my backpack on the train in 1999. Someone from Trans-Adelaide picked it up and rang the number on the tag.

Last week I did the same thing and Trans-Adelaide rang the bomb squad who blew up my uni notes—presumably they had trouble trying to defuse my German essay.

I’m angry, and not just because I spent ages on that essay, but because everyone’s so paranoid about being blown up by terrorists. Get over it—the chances of it happening are minuscule. You’re far more likely to die of food poisoning, get hit by a car or be murdered.

Feel better?

The myth

In the 2001 State of the Union Address, US President George Bush told us of a powerful organisation called al Qaeda, which had ‘thousands’ of terrorists that ‘hide in countries around the world to plot evil and destruction.’ Both the former prime minister, John Howard, and the Leader of the Liberal Party, Brendan Nelson, said in September 2007 that terrorism was the greatest threat to our nation.

We are told that there is a highly organised terrorist network which is, at this very moment, plotting our demise. Some hide out in sophisticated terrorist lairs, desperately trying to lay their evil hands on weapons of mass destruction. Others have infiltrated our society—they could be anyone—and are poised to attack us at any time, in any place.

But in truth, that’s bullshit. It’s about as real as my German essay.

The truth

The US Department of Homeland Security has spent millions of dollars searching for terrorist cells in America—they didn’t find any. The American military spent months searching for terrorist hideouts in Tora Bora, Afganistan—they didn’t find any. If al Qaeda really is such a powerful and well-resourced terrorist network, then where are the apocalyptic attacks we’ve been alert (and alarmed) about?

‘A perfectly plausible explanation is that there are no terrorists here (in the West),’ writes John Mueller, a political scientist at Ohio State University in the respected New York journal Foreign Affairs. ‘I don’t say there’s no threat, but the threat has been massively exaggerated.’

In reality, al Qaeda is a miniscule group, most of whom killed themselves in 2001. The group hasn’t committed another terrorist attack on the West since.

The Madrid bombing was committed by various foreigners, as well as Spanish nationals. The London bombings where carried about by English nationals who where ‘inspired’ by al Qaeda, and the Bali Bombings committed by an unrelated group on their home soil. Other than loosely shared ideologies and names, none of these groups had any connection or contact with each other, or ‘al Qaeda’.

Al Qaeda is, in fact, a ‘brand name’ for terrorism that we have created. Osama bin Laden had never actually referred to his group as ‘al Qaeda’ until after the 2001 attacks when he found out that was the name being used in the West.

Jason Burke is the author of Al Qaeda: The True Story of Radical Islam. ‘That bin Laden ran a coherent organisation with operatives and cells all around the world of which you could be a member is a myth. There is no Al Qaeda organisation... That idea of a coherent, structured terrorist network with an organised capability simply does not exist.’

Calm down

We have an irrational fear of terrorism which is spurred on by politicians, the media, and our own emotions. The graphic images of 9/11 have been burnt into the western consciousness.

Benjamin Friedman from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) likens attitudes about terrorism to shark attacks and kidnappings. ‘Terrorism is strange, uncontrollable and forms a ready mental image. So people overestimate terrorism's risk and demand excessive protection from it.’

Politicians’ dire warnings of attacks are like parents warning their children of boogey-men. They announce that only they can protect us, and protecting us is easy, especially when nothing’s there.

The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself

Not only is the fear of terrorism irrational and false, it’s downright dangerous. While we hide beneath the sheets fearing terrorists under our beds, we ignore issues which pose a far greater threat to our lives, from basic healthcare to global warming.

Over US$1 trillion has been spent on the ‘War on Terror’ by the United States Government alone, not to mention the troops, time, energy and enormous international effort. Imagine what we could have done with those resources.

We could have provided clean drinking water worldwide, massively reduced the planet’s dependence on fossil fuels or given every ActNow member a few billion dollars.

Terrorism 101

So now that we know there is no al Qaeda, what is there?

Well there is an idea, a banner for disaffected Muslims and radical Islamists to unite under. A banner which we the West, with the help of bin Laden, have created. A banner which didn’t exist before 2001.

This is the real threat of terrorism—it’s what inspired the ‘home grown’ attacks in London and Bali. But it’s being comprehensively ignored under the current ‘War on Terror’.

Terror-fied

Terrorism relies on us being terrified; it is our response to terrorism that determines its impact. 9/11 didn’t just kill thousands of people, even worse, it made us terrified.

The 9/11 attacks created fear and suspicion which still lingers today. By creating so much panic we have elevated trivial groups like al Qaeda to a level of power they could have only dreamt of. Al Qaeda provoked the West into reacting with what many, nationally and internationally, perceive as the ‘War on Islam’.

To potential terrorists, reality doesn't matter—but perceptions do.

Suspicion and fear of Muslims at home, from racist jokes to Pauline Hanson’s calls for a ban on Muslim immigration, are divisive. The fiasco with Brisbane doctor Mohammed Haneef has further alienated the Muslim community. So do recent revelations that ASIO officers illegally detained a 22-year-old Muslim medical student.

Similar and even more ridiculous attempts at prosecuting ‘terrorists’ have occurred overseas. In the US authorities claimed that a homemade video of rides at Disneyland was actually preparation for an attack. It turned out that the ‘Islamist terrorists’ where really just Muslim tourists.

On the London Underground police shot an innocent man seven times in the head when they confused him with a terrorism suspect.

The international kidnapping and torture of suspects, called ‘extraordinary rendition’ by the US government, is arrogant beyond belief. In one case the CIA kidnapped a man from Milan, Italy, and then flew him to Egypt to ‘legally’ torture him. When it realised he had no information they released him, more than a year after he disappeared. In Italy there are now arrest warrants for 13 CIA operatives linked mission.

But it doesn’t matter what you think of the Iraq war, ‘extraordinary rendition’, Guantanamo Bay or racial profiling. Justified or not, they feed into the argument that the West is engaged in a war against Islam. An argument that may be pushing moderate Muslims into extremism, especially if they are excluded from mainstream society.

In a 2006 report called Bringing it Home, the respected UK-based think tank Demos said: ‘The government’s response to terrorism is alienating the very communities it needs to engage, and that their growing sense of grievance, anger and injustice inadvertently legitimises the terrorists’ aims, with or without their active consent.’

Don’t get me wrong

I’m not saying we should ignore terrorism. But we should put it in perspective. Blowing up people has always been illegal—we don’t need new laws and we don’t need new wars. We need to focus on better integration and cultural understanding not just for warm fuzzies, but for our own good. We should approach terrorism calmly and with rationality, and treat it like any other crime.

If we are terrified, then the terrorists have won.

Want more, think I’m wrong?

Below is the third of three BBC documentaries by Adam Curtis which examine the rise of fundamentalist Islam and the West’s reaction.



If you’d like to query or challenge anything, drop me a line in the comments box.

How do I know this?

ABC 2007, Terrorism threat more immediate than climate change: PM, 28 September, http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/09/28/2045948.htm  

Briggs, R et al 2006, ‘Bringing it home—community-based approaches to counter-terrorism’, Demos, http://www.demos.co.uk/files/Bringing%20it%20Home%20-%20web.pdf  

Burke, J 2007, ‘There’s no single story to Al Qaeda, The Guardian, 11 November, http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,2209191,00.html  

Curtis, A 2004, The power of nightmares: The rise of the politics of fear, BBC

Friedman, B 2005, ‘The hidden cost of homeland defense’, Audit of Conventional Wisdom, MIT, May, http://mit.edu/cis/pdf/Audit_11_05_Friedman.pdf  

Mascolo, G & Gebauer, M 2007, ‘CIA in the dock’, Der Spiegel, http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,458821,00.html  

Mueller, J 2006, Is there still a terrorist threat?: the myth of the omnipresent enemy, Foreign Affairs, Sep/Oct, http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20060901facomment85501/john-mueller/is-there-still-a-terrorist-threat.html  

This work is licenced under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence.
© 2008. First published on actnow.com.au

Tell me about creative commons licences

Discuss Now

Post Comment 1 | 2 |

RSS Comments
image

Yuilden 06-Apr-2008

Nicely done.

Frankly I'm over terrorists being clumped into one ambiguous group. When the War on terrorism started many dictators used it as a blanket excuse to root out dissidents fighting for legit causes so they could get their 'I'm fighting terrorism badge' from the US.

Hamas is cited as a terrorist organization - and while oversimplifying a complex situation Israel - by nature of using their armed forces does not get labeled as such, even though the use of cluster bombs and heavy firepower to find the needle in the haystack is far worse. Something is only terrorism when a rag tag bunch do it.

Iraq - oh the terrorists....Better to label them as insurgents or in some cases partisans/freedom fighters. But when Militias such as the madhi army establish some modicum of law and order and even some basic services - just to have the Invaders go well....we don't like x Militia - lets bomb the place. What follows is ethnic cleansing since it was precisely the Militia's keeping the car bombers etc off the street in check.

But as most of you will have perceived, this is an ideological struggle, it's not even muslim v christians. No this has more of a Machiavellian feel to it - make a threat/villian and say 'only we (whatever party) can fight it' the other side is soft on communism....I mean terrorism. The increased security just feeds our paranoia and gives the appearance of doing something while soft targets are left alone.

Thats one of the irrational aspects of this whole thing - if groups like Al-Quada was so sophisticated why on earth would they continue hitting planes or trying to get their hands on WMD's. Why would you continue hitting targets of high security (aside from the publicity) or get your hands on expensive weapons that you still have to get to a target - that have a very good chance of detection. Alot more damage and return on investment can be done with unsophisticated attacks - or even rumours than some crappy dirty bomb.

And the whole reap what you sow thing - I could go either way on Al-Quada being real, but being CIA trained/armed. Pakistans SIS as well - the surrogate CIA org - Pakistan with nukes is a legitimate danger vs Iraq. Now you have former Iraqi insurgents being assimilated into their security forces....see a problem. Then we get to the US giving away weapons....hey look we're giving weapons to Israel - so to keep some sort of parity in the region lets give 3bn dollars worth to the Saudi's and Egyptians as well.....good job. Stop freaking arming poor human rights nations.

If a terrorist group has a legitimate cause it can't hurt to talk to them. Saying nah we wont talk to a terrorist group (or framing Iran/Iraq as one) yet all options are on the table achieves nothing. Look at the IRA - the whole situation was useless until both sides were able to admit wrong and come to some sort of arrangement.

Again, well done Benny - the whole situation is just retarded.

-----

image

Rita 19-Dec-2007

I agree. The issue of terrorism has been exaggerated to the extent where we have ordinary people at home sitting on the edges of their seat every time a new story about a potential terrorist attack appears on the nightly news. Where did it occur? Who could it be? Should we take action? Tape down your houses and lock the doors.

Why are we sitting on the edges of our seat? Because we simply don’t know enough about the issue. Most people only know what they see, hear, read through the media. What we should stop doing is being scared or ‘angry,’ and avoid socially isolating ourselves from certain racial groups in society. Do the opposite. Don’t hang onto your seats and create further racial tension. Think about why terrorism happens. Create love. Not war.

-----

image

adrienne 17-Dec-2007

this opinion piece was well researched and detailed. Terrorism has been completely blown out of proportion and still terrorism is automatically linked to muslim people. We still need to break down ignorant barriers about islam, muslims are still be automatically stereotyped and judged. When will the racial prejudice end!

-----

image

gammagum 17-Dec-2007

Great article Benny!
Its so frustrating that few people recognise this. Hopefully articles like this will make it easier for people to articulate what terrorism really is.

-----

image

Sheree 07-Dec-2007

applauds you
this is so good, I wish I had written it!

What genius decided we could start a war on an emotion anyway? Oh that's right...The genius himself, George W Bush. I don't even think he knows what he's doing. I think he's merely a puppet to the strategists of the Bush Administration, cunningly aware that their dopey President will cop all the blame while they think of new ways to fool the people.

Sure it doesn't help having limited brain cells and being the President of one of the most powerful nations in the world. But I'm just saying we should be wary of the propagandists and the deputies, in the same vein that people should have been wary of Goebbels and co.

To add to the list of disgraceful acts against the Muslim people:

It seems even the moderate politicians in the US are getting a taste of it too.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/foreign/tobyharnden/d...

The whole thing makes me sick really but I'm glad this article was written. It's long overdue.

-----