This service is no longer live but has been archived for information purposes only. Click here for more info.
 

Water use goes deeper than you think

We're the smartest animals on Earth but we do some pretty silly things when it comes to water.

Submitted 5/17/2007 By Irv Views 19434 Comments 6 Updated 7/15/2007

Bottled water

Humans are the smartest animals ever to roam the Earth. You’d be hard pressed to find anyone who disagrees with this statement. Unfortunately, in Australia it would almost be equally as difficult to find anyone who would not be prepared to purchase 600mL of bottled water for anywhere between $1 and $4! Not only does this make absolutely no sense when compared to the price of water from the tap, but it is also a terrible thing to do for our environment.

Bottled water must first be pumped out of the ground (easy enough), then must be purified (potentially wasting some), bottled (potentially spilling some, plus water is used in creating the bottles out of petrochemicals), this water is then transported all over Australia; unnecessarily using fossil fuels, all to get you the water which you could otherwise have got straight out of your tap.

Won’t someone else deal with it?

We live in a time of either ‘someone else will deal with it’, or ‘they’ll think of a solution when it becomes a real problem’. Both of these statements are potentially damaging to the environment now and into the future. Despite Australia’s HUGE potential to move towards the use of renewable energies from solar, wind or geothermal, we still burn coal, fitting into the ‘they’ll think of a solution when it becomes a real problem’ view of the world. Many people are awakening to the issues associated with our coal use, but what about our water use?

As the smartest animal to ever roam the earth, we also flush our toilets with drinkable water, take long showers, show great pride in our water thirsty gardens.

We need more water right? The idea of a desalinisation plant seems to be the perfect solution.To many people desalinisation plants seem like the silver bullet solution to our current water crisis. Just as we are producing too much CO2, we are also using too much water. But let’s unpack the idea of a desalinisation plant.

Desalinisation, the silver bullet?

Salts in the ocean come from weathering of rocks and are transported into the ocean by rivers. If these salts can be removed from sea water, we are left with two things; drinking water and a salty (and potentially toxic) brine. The removal of these salts is done in a desalinisation plant. Unfortunately; desalinisation plants are expensive to build and need a steady energy supply to desalinise water. Desalinisation of water will cause the cost of water to increase (not to mention the possible impact on the local ecosystems). Surely there are alternatives before we go down the path of expensive, costly desalinisation plants.

So what can we do?

I am not saying that I am against desalinisation plants for major cities and towns, but there is a more logical first step. CONSERVATION. Take a look at your daily water usage. Do you have a water saving shower head, a dual flush toilet, do you have any dripping taps? Or, think about your diet. Wasting food (particularly meat) is a waste of water. Throwing away that grain fed chicken is a big deal. We used to feed chickens scraps that we could not eat. We now feed them grain (which is seen as a marketing tool) which we could have otherwise eaten!

Australia is the driest inhabited continent on Earth. If you don’t like the idea of shorter showers, think about that next time you are in the shower. Or that some farmers cannot grow food for you to eat through lack of water. You will get out quick smart. Trust me.

Water is too precious in this time of drought. Don’t drag your feet, ACT NOW.

How do I know this?

Archer, J. 2005, Twenty Thirst Century – The Future of Water in Australia, Pure water press, Pearl Beach, NSW
Visit John’s website at http://www.johnarcher.com.au/  

Flannery, T, 2005, The Weather Makers: The History & Future Impact of Climate Change,Text Publishing, Melbourne
Visit Tim’s website at http://www.theweathermakers.com/  

Radcliffe, J 2007, Water in Australia, presentation given at Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia

Suzuki, D & Dressel H 2002, Good News for a Change – How everyday people are helping the planet, Greystone Books, Canada
Visit David’s website at www.davidsuzuki.org/

Discuss Now

Post Comment 1 | 2 |

RSS Comments
image

Dylan 25-May-2007

Fantastic point again.

Unfortunately there is only so much I can fit into one article. You are correct. There are plenty of other alternatives.

In Adelaide there is currently some water recycling. Water is used on golf courses etc (this is not drinkable water). Although this could be expanded, recycled drinking water has been used in other countries for quite a while.

There is also something called Aquifer Storage Recharge (ASR) which is basically stormwater storage. Stormwater is channelled into a man made wetland to remove some pollution; it is then pumped into a sandy aquifer until it is needed.

As far as Sydney is concerned, from what I am told there is reduced rainfall in the catchment area of Sydney meaning the ground water that is used is not recharging. This is being offset by the fact that more water is falling onto the city of Sydney. So water tanks may be a good option for those who can afford them.

Conservation is the simple things that ordinary people can do now, without waiting for governments to act.

Hope this piece of info has been useful.... Keep posting questions and comments!

-----

image

Clinton 25-May-2007

Good points about the bottled water and desal Dylan.

But is conservation the only answer? I think there's a lot of awareness on conservation, but it hasn't got rid off the problem. What about recycling? There's some interesting stuff from the Dems about this: http://www.democrats.org.au/campaigns/water_recycling/

They say that we could recycle water and not ever have to drink it! It's ridiculous that storm water isn't being harvested and that all industry doesn't use low-grade recycled water. I'm all for it.

But yeah, I've heard that if everyone in Sydney (for instance) had a rainwater tank: problem solved!

-----

image

Dylan 25-May-2007

PS that was supposed to say

Back to bottled water, here's somthing to think about.

Water use in the home is measured in kilolitres. A kilolitre is a cubic metre of water (1m x 1m x 1m cube). In SA a cubic metre of water costs $0.48-$1.08.

Sorry about that

-----

image

Dylan 24-May-2007

Some more water interesting info

Back to bottled water, here's somthing to think about.

Water use in the home is measured in kilolitres. A kilolitre is a cubic metre of water (1m x 1m x 1m cube). In SA a cubic litre of water costs $0.48-$1.08 per kilolitre.

If you buy your water in 600ml bottles for $3.00 each, that works out to $5000 per kilolitre. Do you think the bottled water companies are doing well? Of course they are.


-----

image

Dylan 19-May-2007

Hey Rach, thanks for the questions! We'll see how I go answering them....

Depending on the output of a Desal plant, it may need to run night and day (ruling out solar).

Vast amounts of electricity are used in the desal process (this is why water prices rise, paying off the initial construction costs, plus the ongoing electricity used), which will produce loads of atmospheric pollution (CO2 etc.). Enter the new concept of Nuke Desal where energy comes from 'clean and green' nuclear to reduce pollution. (Stay tuned for my next article aimed at debunking this concept) Duh, nuclear waste has its own issues plus the nuclear process is nowhere as ‘clean’ as we are lead to believe.

This means that ecosystems on the whole may suffer, plus the marine wildlife that may get drawn into the intake systems.

The argument about rainwater tanks is a really great point. Though conservation and storing our own water we may reduce the need for desal. It is an interesting balance act that I'm sure will be considered in depth in the not so distant future.

Hope this helps.

PS No. I would have loved to hear him in person. He is such a broad thinker and a hero of mine.

-----