Who's killing who?

Nikki puts shark attacks into perspective...

Submitted 10/01/2007 By Ding Views 17583 Comments 11 Updated 7/02/2008


Photographer : Sharyn Morrow


God damn my legs are looking fine! Honey brown and so they should be. Summer is here and I’ve filled my days at the beach—surfing, ice-cream, beach cricket… and obviously working on the tan!

There have been a few dramas though…

I was body boarding last Saturday and the waves were awesome—heavenly curves with perfect breaks. A massive wave approached and I geared up for an awesome ride. It started well, and I was cruising into shore when I slid off. I popped up, only to be whacked in the head by my board. BAM! It hurt so much. But don’t worry; I knew exactly what to do.

I grabbed the stupid board and dragged it back to my house. Running inside, I grabbed the kitchen knife, sharpened it and then darted back outside. I circled the board, knife in hand, and then in a moment of rage, stabbed the useless thing.

DIE! Die, you stupid board! How dare you hurt me!

Well, actually, I didn’t do that at all. That would be ridiculous.

Just like it’s ridiculous that the public often wants the shark killed when a person enters the sea and gets attacked. I hate to point out the obvious but sharks LIVE in the sea, it is THEIR home, YOU are responsible if you choose to enter their domain.

The sad irony is that the money Australian governments spend (due to public outcry) on netting to ‘protect’ Australian beaches has both dramatic consequences and is in contradiction to their other actions. For instance, many shark species, including the Great White Shark, are actually listed as threatened species. under the federal Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. This means our governments are spending money to both kill sharks and protect them!

Shark nets are rectangular pieces of net suspended vertically in the water between buoys. They have mesh holes that are small enough not to bother small fish but the right size to entangle sharks.

The problem?

Other than the fact that we shouldn’t be trying to kill sharks in the first place, is that the nets trap all types of large marine life. This includes dolphins, whales and manta rays.

Let’s put shark attacks in perspective. My body boarding anecdote was a joke, but if you are going to get angry at sharks, you might as well get angry at surf boards and body boards because more people die from accidental drowning and submersion when surfing than they do from shark attacks. And it’s not just surfing either, the risk of dying from rock fishing, skin diving, or swimming is significantly higher than by shark attack. In 1995, 441 people died from these water activities, while only 1 person died from a shark attack in Australia.

It’s the sharks that need to be protected against us. On average per year there are less than 30 deaths worldwide due to shark attacks, but human fishing kills up to 100 million sharks. No wonder up to 80% of shark species are threatened with extinction.

Sharks kill to survive. Humans kill for fun, boredom, anger, sport…

It’s not sharks that are the threat. It’s us.

Oh, and just for the record, my body board is still in fine form but as for my legs… that may have been a little white lie…

How do I know this?

Department of the Environment and Heritage, Sharks in Australian Waters, http://www.deh.gov.au/coasts/species/sharks/index.html

Meerman, R 2007, 'Shark Nets', ABC Science Online, http://www.abc.net.au/science/slab/sharknets/   

Taronga and Western Plains Zoos 2006, Australian shark attack file,
http://www.zoo.nsw.gov.au/content/view.asp?id=235

Discuss Now

Post Comment 1 | 2 | 3 |

RSS Comments
image

Chelsie 15-Jan-2007

Interesting article Nikki. I didn't realise that netting was used as 'protection' from sharks. I agree with Nicholaas - unfortunately public fear is a huge force behind many political decisions. However, this doesn’t mean that the decisions made are always right.

It’s a fact of life – we as humans are most scared of the most scary way of dying, even if the probability of dying such a death is minute. The real issue here is a lack of public awareness and the media doesn't help in this respect. One shark attack and you can guarantee that it'll be front page headlines, people will be thinking twice before heading down to the beach, and the government is forced to take some action if they want votes at the next election.

It’s a shame that more isn't done to remind us to put a shark attack into perspective, remind us where the safest places are to swim and how to take some personal responsibility. This would be far more effective long term than simply reinforcing a somewhat irrational public fear and needlessly spending dollars killing endangered species.

-----

image

ArtTherapist 13-Jan-2007

Well yes Nikki... I believe you have intentially taken me out of context to make me look silly. I didn't say anything about killing off dangerous species! Let me reiterate for you:

"Humans kill for fun, boredom, anger, sport…"

Well yes some do (and I loathe the concept of killing for pleasure) but like sharks humans kill in defence too. Which was the point I made about terminating a dangerous dog, spider or whatever. NOT, commiting animal genocide and wiping out species.

Furthermore, when a shark attacks I'm quite confident it knows exactly what it is doing: it is feeding. A shark which feeds in a location where people frequently swim is likely to continue to feed in that location where people swim and thus represents a danger to the swimmers. If this shark eats someone we could just say " Oh well it's okay, the shark didn't mean it. The water is its domain." but the truth is this shark is likley to feed again in the same spot. Killing the shark is a solution to this problem.

I'm not all doom and gloom though, like I said i hate killing, so a better solution could be to re-locate the animal, I just don't know if tis is a practical option.

Finally. I agree the worst killers of them all are ourselves! I'm pretty sure this world could be a lot better place if we could take certain people oout of it! (but not killing, because i hate killing, so perhaps relocation is the answer!!)

-----

image

Nikki 12-Jan-2007

Hey Niichoolaas!

Thanks for your comment.

Fear is indeed a very powerful tool. Unfortunately, one the government and I fear the media manipulate to pursuade us of their views.

'scared to Death of Sharks' Clever :)

-----

image

Nikki 12-Jan-2007

ArtTherapist,

You make some good points but I'm still not convinced.

1) Sharks aren't actually as dangerous as we're led to believe. They are not gathering together and plotting our deaths. They attack people by mistake. MISTAKE. We kill millions of sharks a year INTENTIONALLY.

2) Okay, let's presume your second argument is justified and that we should kill all 'dangerous' animals as we put ourselves as the most important species.

Did you know bees kill more people a year than sharks? Better kill them too.

What about bears? They've been known to kill them, better wipe them off earth as well.

Hippo's kill hundreds of people in Africa year. Might as well get out your short gun...

What about mosquitos that carrying maleria? Maleria kills millions of people a year. Should we kill all the mosquitos? And what tse tse flies???

And don't forget tigers, lions.... the list goes on forver. BUT the animal that has killed the most people, is US. HUMANS KILLING HUMANS. So if we're going to try and erase all dangerous creatures, we might as well start with ourselves.

-----

image

Niichoolaas 11-Jan-2007

Maybe this appeals to me because your (somewhat unpopular) viewpoint is also mine but enjoyable nonetheless. :)
Public fear, justified or not, forces many political decisions. Maybe this is one that is just a little too much on the foolish side because hell who isnt scared to Death of sharks.

-----